|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 11/03/11 11:31
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:25:44 GMT, kyra <kyra@cotse.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/cbstory/
>>
>> Works perfect in IE but in Netscape/Firefox it fuxors. The problem is
>> the transparent image overlays. The obvious approach would be to
>> split apart the overlaid images into 4 sections and just leave the
>> text area uncovered...however that would require at least a good 3 to
>> 4 hours of work and...well I'd rather just set the text box on top,
>> loose the aesthetics and say to hell with the Netscape and FF users.
>>
>> The only other thing I can think of is using the Javascript focus()
>> function...however even if the focus is put on the text box I'm bettin
>> it still won't work. Does anyone have any other ideas? Maybe
>> something that works like wmode?
>>
>
>could it be something with the javascript?
Oh it's not really a problem it's just the way the two browsers
operate. In IE if you click on an image that has a transparent
section it'll focus onto whatever is beneath it, but in
Netscape/FireFox it treats the transparent section as if it were like
a solid pane of glass and won't focus on the text layer underneath it.
But then even if there were a way to put the focus on the text layer
it'd probably still be impossible to move the scroll bar since it's in
effect underneath a "pane of glass".
></iframe>
> should be <\/iframe>
Ahhh, yup...doesn't change anything though.
>or in the .net iframe you are defining the same id 2x?
>
> div class='pos' id='image_map' style='left: 61px; top:371px;
>
> div class='pos' id='image_map' style='left:645px; top:371px;
Similar to above, those IDs aren't being used to alter anything so it
shouldn't be a problem (although validators might see it as an error).
I've decided to just reconstruct the whole thing into partial
sections, it'll work that way in Netscape and FF, however my primary
motivation for doing it is that it'll reduce the overall file size to
one eight of it's current size (which is about 3.5 megabytes).
Altering the code isn't too bad, but converting all the images will
take me a couple hours...although I suppose I could throw together a
batch script to speed it up.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|