|
|
Posted by Ivan Bujas on 12/08/05 22:42
"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:mug7p1l58124btu6rpbv9jc7b65mi8o4om@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:06:15 GMT, Drew
> <whoisthatmaskedman@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Well it is a rather effective means of incurring harsh overly critical
> >> analysis of my work...basically the rejects like yourself...I'm just
> >> using you to further my art...although in your case, yer just a fuckin
> >> burn out, cause you can't seem to identify a specific aspect of a
> >> specific work of mine that has something specifically wrong with it
> >> (non-aesthetic based)...
>
> >Well first off let's re-clarify that it was you who stated "My skill in
> >typing is as badass as my skill in web design," so thus all critique
> >will cover aesthetic and non-aesthetic aspects of your work.
>
> >The inconsistent kerning of Backwater Productions on your home page is
> >pathetic and amateurish.
>
> How is it amateurish, Stupid, it's supposed to look like it's UNDER
> WATER...tell us all though, how would you make text look like it's
> under water WITHOUT altering the kerning? Uh oh, didn't quite think
> that one through too good, didja?
>
> >Badass web designers complete their site before declaring it thusly (ie:
> >Products and Contact). Jeeze, can't you even post contact info?
>
> Well since I currently don't have any products to sell, it might be a
> little hard to put them up. As for the contact information, yeah
> right, what are you fucking stupid? I get enough contract work
> WITHOUT putting any contact information on there, I'm not looking to
> flood myself just yet.
>
> >The drum beat rollovers, the whooshing breeze and sliding portfolio
> >effects are worthless.
>
> If you're blind and deaf, yeah I suppose they would be pretty
> worthless, but then the design wasn't made around people like that.
> I'm sure in your perfect world 'o Stupid all sites would have plain
> white backgrounds with plain black text and no graphics at all...but
> then you wouldn't know art if it crawled up yer ass, laid eggs and
> they hatched inside you and ate their way out. And uh, your bitching
> about the sounds and such is an AESTHETIC perspective.
>
> >"Breeder of Australian Shepherd dogs." is not a complete sentence in
> >contrast to your other descriptions that are.
>
> That would be a copy editing issue and has nothing AT ALL to do with
> DESIGN, Stupid.
>
> >http://www.tripoweraussies.com/ is basically a box on a white
> >background.
>
> Stupid, every site that's ever been made could be called a box on a
> background. I dunno, maybe in the land of STUPID they make like
> triangular monitors or something, but here in REALITY, all monitors
> are some kind of box shape.
>
> >Totally uncool.
>
> Yeah, throw yer whole fuckin monitor out the window, it's a fuckin
> box, that's totally uncool. All the cool kids have TRAPEZOID
> monitors!
>
> >And what's with the scroll bars that aren't needed?
>
> Which site are you referring to and what browser and OS are you using?
> I think you're starting to confuse design problems with shit browser
> problems.
>
> >The rollovers are trite and overused.
>
> How so?
>
> >Nothing "badass" here.
>
> Actually there are several bad ass things about that site...none of
> which an AMATEUR like you would ever notice or realize. That's one of
> my oldest sites though and I could do a lot more "badass" things with
> it, by utilizing more PNG alpha transparencies to cut the total site
> size down to 1/5th of it's current standing.
>
> >Click on Males then Family, for example and your Venus, Kitsy, Jack
> >image doesn't match up with the box properly.
>
> Maybe on the Mac it doesn't.
>
> >http://www.backwater-productions.net/wwcc/cell-biology/ Worse problems
> >here. Are you using a template? White box in image shows incomplete work
> >and lack of knowledge.
>
> ...what "white box in image"? Again, must be some kind of a mac
> issue.
>
> >Are you sure that http://www.backwater-productions.net/wwcc/histology-1/
> >is W3C compliant as you claim?
>
>
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.backwater-productions.net/wwcc/
histology-1/index.html
>
> Well considering the W3C is the one making the claim...uh, yeah. Dum,
> dum, dum!
>
> >Please explain the lack of functionality here:
> >http://www.backwater-productions.net/wwcc/yoga-online/ Did Ms. Johnson
> >really pay your for this site? You need to give her her money back, plus
> >interest.
>
> That site was designed to work specifically for Internet Explorer on
> the PC, no other browser or OS, that was the clients
> choice...partially because it was just a prototype, so it only needed
> to work on one browser and OS.
>
> >That's it from my corner of the world. As I stated earlier, I'm just a
> >janitor. There's the trash.
>
> Everything you look at on a Mac is trash.
>
> --
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter
> mhm Ή x Ή
> http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|