|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 12/20/05 05:20
Jake wrote:
> In message <MvCdnbj31q3xsjveRVn-hg@adelphia.com>, Rob McAninch
> <rob_13@excite.com> writes
> >Jake>:
> >> In message <dcmdnekii6a7qzneRVn-sA@adelphia.com>, Rob McAninch
> >><rob_13@excite.com> writes
> >>>
> >>> Actually, getting frames to be search engine friendly isn't so hard,
> >>> if you take the time to do it.
> >> Actually, getting frames to be search engine friendly is very easy
> >>indeed.
> >> I was interested in seeing what the poster had discovered that
> >> wasn't generally known.
Well. What isn't generally known about frames.
That example you gave is not really a very good one. For example. In
FireFox. If you make the text bigger, as a person with loe vision, such
as myself would, by holding down the control key and pressing the +
sign. You will see that it doesn't re-size properly. So you would need
to scrole to read most of the content. If was not for the Meta Tags.
That site would not even appear in the SE's. It doesn't even show the
right frame in the source code. That is what the search bot sease when
it looks at the code. So you get hardly any content. Also, I doubt very
highly that a text only browser would be able to handle frames.
For more details you may want to read the artical I wrote on the
subject at:
http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc/design-tips1.html
I hope this helps.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|