Posted by Greg N. on 12/28/05 02:10

Spartanicus wrote:

> Some things cannot be added to HTML without fundamentally breaking every
> single UA in existence.

I don't buy that for two reasons:

1. It's like each and every new element that was ever introduced in HTML
history. It would not break any UA in existence, it would only
(possibly) break pages that use it.

2. It could be implemented in a way that does not hurt old UAs, similar
to frame/noframe, script/noscript etc:

<include src...>
<noinclude>
render this stuff here if include is not supported
</noinclude>

--
Gregor's Motorradreisen:
http://hothaus.de/greg-tour/

• Next in forum: Re: animated gif
• Prev in forum: Re: why is there no INCLUDE function in html?
• Thread view: Re: why is there no INCLUDE function in html?

[Reply to this message]