|
|
Posted by Michael Winter on 01/08/06 21:59
On 08/01/2006 19:11, Gérard Talbot wrote:
> Malte Christensen wrote :
>
>> Bernhard Sturm wrote:
>>
>>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>>
>>> this is a perfect example to demonstrate that valid HTML (the page we
>>> are discussing here validates as 'valid HTML 4.01'!) does not mean
>>> that the page is semantically valid. The source code above is not
>>> structured and semantically questionable if not completely wrong.
>
> I absolutely agree with what J. Little writes exactly here. Your
> webpage, Malte, [...]
You might want to look at what you quoted again more carefully, or look
back through the thread. Jonathan didn't write that paragraph, Bernhard
did and it was in response to Chaddy2222, not the OP.
[M. Christensen:]
>> The interim results after 3 hours are at www.nmalte.dk. I am very
>> pleased with the clarity that this design results in, even if probably
>> everything could be improved.
>
> You're using nested tables at nmalte.dk site!
Again, if you check the thread, it seems that the site underwent change
during the discussion: a revised Strict version was uploaded, but
because it rendered badly in IE, is was moved to
<http://www.nmalte.dk/index.htmlcss>.
Though this latter document does need improvements, and I'm sure your
post was, in hindsight, a simple misunderstanding on your part, I think
you may owe the OP an apology.
To the OP: I forgot to add in my other post that your 'About Me' section
is littered with self-closing paragraphs (<p/>). These are legal in both
HTML and XHTML (though with very different meaning in the former), so
they won't show up as errors when validating, but should be removed or
corrected. I suspect you meant to add actual paragraphs to contain the
content after each 'heading'.
Mike
--
Michael Winter
Prefix subject with [News] before replying by e-mail.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|