Posted by Neredbojias on 01/09/06 11:29

With neither quill nor qualm, Jonathan N. Little quothed:

> Neredbojias wrote:
>
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Kevin Scholl quothed:
> >
> >
> >>>You mean for you as a User? Not that I know. As far as I remember,
> >>>there are no serious security issues using the flash plugin (so it's
> >>>much better than having active-X, Java or JavaScript enabled).
> >>
> >>Erm, just as an aside, Javascript does not have inherent security issues
> >>in and of itself. It's actually remarkably safe. It's when JS is used to
> >>access active-x controls that the problems typically arise.
> >
> >
> > Hear! Hear! Give that man a cigar!
> >
> > (Guess you can tell I agree.)
> >
> Yes, Javascript, not MS's JScript which can access COM on Windows OS

Another MS security issue? Hard to believe...

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

• Next in forum: Re: Any good reason not to use Flash?
• Prev in forum: Re: Using a photo-editor to make web pages - how can I reduce the source code?
• Thread view: Re: Any good reason not to use Flash?

[Reply to this message]