|
Posted by Rob McAninch on 01/21/06 07:49
Jose <teacherjh@aol.nojunk.com> wrote in <news:rpcAf.2602$tb3.129
@newssvr24.news.prodigy.net> :
>> You might try converting your photos into an executable with
>> something like PicturestoExe.
>
> As a user I will not run executables that claim to be pictures.
LOL. Neither will I unless it's from a trusted source. But if you
want my copyrighted pictures, that I don't care to release any
other way, then that's the risk you take:-)
Typically a web-quality JPEG is not very useful outside of the
web anyhow, e.g. having it printed anywhere beyond 4x6 inches
isn't going to be pretty. However, the op said large images were
planned. So another suggestion would be to stick to smaller
images unless the prospective user is interested enough to
request the full size images. Then take apropriate measures.
--
Rob McAninch
http://rock13.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|