|
|
Posted by dorayme on 01/25/06 09:10
In article
<pan.2006.01.25.06.12.29.21860@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
Blinky the Shark <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote:
>The attribution *to nothing* was sloppy but only confusing to >
>someone who doesn't understand attribution in general. So far,
>that seems to belimted to dorayme.
Please God, let me develop as good an understanding about
attribution as Blinky...
At the very least, let me into the deep truths about "attribution
in general"
I will do anything, I will enrol in a course on counting
quotation levels, I will study this rocket science including
alternative methods employed by various newsreaders. Night and
day until I can just glance at any combinations of a-z and > and
answer within a few secs whether it was Pamela or George or Brian
or Sarah or Peter or Paul or Diane or Mary or your son Jesus or
Roger Rabbit who said any particular thing.
Please God, make it an Olympic sport.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|