|
|
Posted by Barbara de Zoete on 01/26/06 01:32
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:24:32 +0100, kditty <kditty@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>> What does your page do at:
>> http://validator.w3.org/
>> http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.html
>>
> Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on line 98-100,
> 102-103 it contained one or more bytes that I cannot interpret as utf-8
> (in other words, the bytes found are not valid values in the specified
> Character Encoding). Please check both the content of the file and the
> character encoding indication.
What's keeping you to correct that and then validate the markup? Besides,
this isn't about the css, is it? You can still validate that.
>>> noone can help me with this? its bothering me to death, cmon guys
>>
>> Why did you repost, and quote the 275 lines of your original post?
>> Please learn to trim.
>
> sorry, i am new to this, i wasnt sure exactly what i was doing. i
> probably shouldnt have pasted the whole code in the first place, but i
> figured most people wouldnt take the time to open a page and view source.
That, opening page, view source, usually takes less time than copy/paste
the code into textpad/notepad, save it as html and open that page from a
local file. And yes, people will want to _see_ the patient before handing
out advise as on how to improve performance and looks.
The lengthy post might also be the reason there was little to no response.
Not everyone likes downloading a large post. I have filtered them out all
together for example. I don't see/read anything over 7kB.
--
______PretLetters:
| weblog | http://www.pretletters.net/_private/weblog.html |
| webontwerp | http://www.pretletters.net/html/webontwerp.html |
|zweefvliegen | http://www.pretletters.net/html/vliegen.html |
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|