|
|
Posted by John Salerno on 02/02/06 16:59
cwdjrxyz wrote:
> Have fun, and each to their own. I do true xhtml 1.1. However xhtml 2
> is not yet final, new browsers likely will be required for some of it,
> and it is not yet included at the W3C validator. Thus I plan to wait
> until something is at least final, there is final validator to check
> your code, and there are browsers available to take full advantage of
> it. But then, there are likely some who will find the study of xhtml 2
> at this stage more interesting than doing a crossword puzzle, and
> likely it will be more useful. Just now, likely most people would find
> more practical use from learning more about codes that will help at
> present. For example learning more PHP, Javascript, and possibly Perl
> would benefit many. If that is not enough, there are all sorts of
> things you can do on a server if you learn Java and C++ well.
>
Oh, I definitely don't plan to learn it right now! I just finished
getting comfortable with HTML/XHTML/CSS (and now I have XHTML 1.1 to
scare me). I was just curious about how the <h> is handled. I figured it
might be something like Jukka's example, but that seems so much messier than
h1 { something }
h2 { something }
etc...
And yet it also seems a lot cleaner...go figure...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|