|
|
Posted by Neil on 10/30/05 22:33
"Steve Jorgensen" <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:um7am1p16ht249oqhnb700uv2qg2007go4@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:59:45 GMT, "Neil" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>Both table have PKs; and the join is on the PKs (the main table has a
>>single-field PK; and the selections table has two field -- the
>>corresponding
>>ID value from the main table combined with the machine name).
>>
>>The 13 second form open time (with the 50k record selections table in the
>>front end joined heterogeneously with the 50k record main table in the
>>back
>>end) is over a WAN. The LAN users get much better performance.
>
> How many records are being returned to the form, and what kind of
> recordset
> are you using? Is any of your links to a view? If linking to a view, did
> you
> select a logical primary key when you created the link?
>
50,000; dynaset; yes, the two tables are combined in the back end using a
view; yes.
But regarding the slowness issue, I think it's resolved. See my other post
in this thread. Thanks.
Neil
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|