|
|
Posted by William Tasso on 04/05/06 20:30
Fleeing from the madness of the "a2i network" jungle
axlq <axlq@spamcop.net> stumbled into
news:alt.html,alt.www.webmaster,comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets
and said:
[greetings from AWW - please feel free to suggest f/ups]
> In article <44330034@clear.net.nz>, Nik Coughlin <nrkn.com@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Richard wrote:
>> A good place to start:
>> http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
>
> You're right, that's nice. They don't take the hard-line religious
> viewpoint that all layout MUST be done in CSS. They do agree that
> tables have uses in layout.
each to their own.
> I do disagree with their recommendation to eliminate <b> and replace
> it with <strong> -- why waste the extra bytes?
hrmm - <strong> is not a replacement for <b>
<b> has no place in the modern web, it is purely a styling detail and as
such deserves to be discarded in favour of a CSS suggestion.
<strong> has an altogether different significance - which may (or may not)
include presenting text in a bold style.
--
William Tasso
http://williamtasso.com/words/what-is-usenet.asp
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|