Posted by Rob Turk on 04/12/06 22:53

<uspensky@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144869108.727995.55910@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> logically that would make sense that MSCS would be responsible for
> everything.
> however.... both nodes are able to see the storage but can only read
> the drives when the respective controller is the active one.
>
> both initiators have access to all the LUNs on the storage. both HBAs
> have access to all LUNs
>

The DS400 wasn't certified for MSCS when it was initially introduced. If you
have a model from before mid-2005 then you may need to update firmware or
contact IBM about the exact features required to make it work with MSCS. The
latest firmware is available from Adaptec's website:
http://www.adaptec.com/ibm/downloads/extstor_systems_index.html

Rob

• Next in forum: Re: failover cluster using 64 bit windows 2k3 on single HBAs and DS400 with dual controller
• Prev in forum: Re: Time to shrink a database
• Thread view: Re: failover cluster using 64 bit windows 2k3 on single HBAs and DS400 with dual controller

[Reply to this message]