|
|
Posted by therealview on 01/22/18 11:45
No, you seem like a cool guy and can see how you misunderstood my
original post that was "trolling" for information. Is that what you
mean? - or am I now sub-trolling in your view, after what was a
legitimate question. Acting completely random in quasi-public places
is a very bad idea considering it's not Usenet 1980, but commercialized
2006 Internet. You need to grow up - it is not I.
robert wrote:
> you're right...and it didn't even cross my mind until now when said troll
> threatened to "ferenheit 451" me but couldn't get past go.
>
> i'll change it. thanks for the thought.
>
> btw...his posts are like car accidents it seems...but i won't be giving him
> any more fuel. shit, this guy should jump on alt.atheism if he'd like a dose
> of what how real threats, intimidation, and bad lighting read. he'd be
> astonished to see that xtian are the ones who hurl them the most often...i
> say that since he seems to fit right in with the fundamentalist wing of the
> republican branch of government...at least by his relishment of this new,
> obscure law that is almost unprosecutable.
>
> someone wise once said to never make a law that cannot be or is not intended
> to be enforced. those days seem far behind us though.
>
> later,
>
> me
>
>
>
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:ntT1g.26458$az4.9537@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> | robert wrote:
> |
> | > surely you are intuitive enough to know that ab@cd.com is the same as
> | > ef@gh.com and ij@kl.com ... guess not.
> |
> | Not to butt in to your exciting repartee with dave/realview, but did you
> | know that cd.com is owned by some folks from Minnetonka, MN? Using their
> | domain (or the gh, or the kl ...) can only serve to have more spam sent
> | to their mail servers. Please use example.com instead of a real domain.
> | Thanks.
> |
> | realview is a troll, I've decided.
> |
> | --
> | -bts
> | -Warning: I brake for lawn deer
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|