|
Posted by Kimmo Laine on 04/26/06 13:49
"da404lewzer" <da404lewzer@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1146033051.555258.305070@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> Anyone interested in helping me startup the ultimate programming
> manual?
>
> http://www.coderwiki.com/
>
Personally I don't support the idea of documenting the php functions because
they already exist at php.net. There is a complete list of php functions
well-documented. And also, php.net's function reference is organized by
function category. Users may contribute with helpful notes so it isn't any
different than your idea. You're just re-inventing the wheel, mate. How are
you going to keep up with php.net? Very important thing is to tell from
which version of php a certain function has been available. It would be more
helpful if the wiki had like articles of design patterns and OOP in php5.
Just add a link to the official php documentation and instructions how to
use it, instead of rewriting the whole shit. Then start making really
interesting php articles that cover areas php.net doesn't. I seriously doubt
it will be the ultimate programming manual, but it has potential like all
wikis. You just need to rethink the contents.
--
"ohjelmoija on organismi joka muuttaa kofeiinia koodiksi" -lpk
spam@outolempi.net | Gedoon-S @ IRCnet | rot13(xvzzb@bhgbyrzcv.arg)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|