|
|
Posted by Bruce Grubb on 04/30/06 02:53
In article
<doraymeRidThis-54BD7F.13585029042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <4bel5sF10l1rlU2@individual.net>,
> Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:23:46 +1000, dorayme
> > <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au>
> > wrote:
> > > In article <bgrubb-06AB7A.19421127042006@news.zianet.com>,
> > > Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@zianet.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Carefull as the last version of IE for the Mac had pretty good CSS
> > >> rendering. Just because the Windows team programmed with its toes does
> > >> not
> > >> mean through throw out the standard.
> > >
> > > Please stop! I beg you! You will give Mac users a bad name.
> >
> > How in the world is pointing out that implementations differ, giving
> > _anyone_ a bad name? News flash; he's right, _and_, he couldn't "give
> > Mac users a bad name" regardless of what he says or who he is.
> >
>
> You need to go deeper into the thread to see this. IE Mac is
> basically irrelevant to the trouble with IE. The whole thing
> started with Bruce Grubb saying silly things about not needing to
> worry about making special provisions for IE. IE means IE Win.
In comp.sys.mac.apps? Yeah right. The reason this came here was because
you and other were making really silly comments.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|