|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/23/31 11:46
In article <bgrubb-D531E6.17562429042006@news.zianet.com>,
Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@zianet.com> wrote:
> Keeping [css]this to a minimum does wonders.
> > > > Ah! So now it comes out. I knew there was something singular
> > > > about your attitude from the beginning and here it is in all its
> > > > naive glory: you see css as some fancy doodle dandy thing best
> > > > left out.
> > >
> > > No as I use it in my own HTML Tidied pages. I just use it sparingly.
> >
> > Sparingly? When it is forced on you by a bit of Tidy introducing
> > it to tidy up some confusions...
>
> What are you talking about? I tidy up my HTML as a matter of practice and
> have been doing that every since I found out about HTML Tidy.
Tidy adds some css when it needs to. For all your talk, you
presumably think having none at all is best, it is then forced on
you by Tidy and of course, Tidy is "a good thing" in your brain
and so you accept a bit of css as being good. But nothing that
you initiate... something you reluctantly accept.
I have changed my mind. Please don't go away. Just hang there and
swing. You never know, someone as nice as Million Dollar Babe
might come along for a workout and be advised by Clint Eastwood
on how best to er... ahem... tackle you....
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|