|
|
Posted by Xplanes on 10/24/86 11:46
"Bill" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:jYP4g.291$X_1.1708@eagle.america.net...
> Neredbojias wrote:
>
>> So why use a WYSIWYG editor which definitely has inferior html
>> rendering capabilities and most likely even inferior text-editing
>> capabilities?
>
> If, like my self, you do very little HTML work an editor that does not
> require you to remember or look up all of the HTML syntax can save a
> lot of time. For someone who is fluent a text editory may be a better
> solution. To each his/her own. :)
>
> Thanks again for the suggestions.
>
> --
> .Bill.
Go to www.evrsoft.com and try 1st page 2000. it's free, it has syntax
highlighting, a built in browser to see your changes, but it isn't what I
would call WYSIWYG. It has a tab that shows the syntax for when you forget,
but the editing is in the code, not drag and drop code blocks. It has a
nice "replace" feature too. I've been using it for years and credit it for
learning html on my own.
Lou
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|