|
Posted by Daniel Tryba on 06/14/07 11:17
Andy Hassall <andy@andyh.co.uk> wrote:
> PHP's image functions are based on GD, which as you say are not great for
> photographic images.
Funny, I never noticed this... What is the problem of GD with
photographs? I don't see anything wrong...
> ImageMagick does a better job on photographs - although you usually have to
> call it as an external process. It's also faster.
I've heard this before somewhere else about a year or two ago. I
searched for benchmarks and found that sometimes gd is faster, sometimes
imagemagick IIRC. A link to usefull benchmarks would be nice.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|