|
|
Posted by Tim Weaver on 05/20/06 14:34
Veronica Karlsson wrote:
> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> > Veronica Karlsson wrote:
>> >
>> > >> http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?q=&url=www.backwater-product
>> > >> ions.net
>> > >>
>> > >> The quarter MILLION or so people who visit my server seem to think
>> > >> otherwise.
>> >
>> > >Have they emailed you and told you what they think or are you just
>> > >assuming that they must like it because of how many they are?
>> >
>> > ...if they didn't like em, why would my ranking continually increase?
>> > DUM DUM DUM DUM
>>
>> Is this "ranking" based on something human, like interviews with users,
>> or some kind of technical measurement, like "hits" or something? IOW,
>> what does it *mean*? (clue: "many hits" != "readers like it")
>>
>> > Boy, you sure do look STUPID when you try and justify your blatant
>> > idiocy.
>> >
>> > >> See you can say my sites suck as much as you want...
>> >
>> > >"sites"? I was just commenting on one page (the one you mentioned at
>> > >the beginning of this thread), and that one does suck.
>> >
>> > So what sucks about it?
>>
>> Do you think it would be a good idea for me to tell you that? Surely
>> it's enough information to tell you that it does suck?
>>
>> > You know, pushing aside your blatant penis
>> > envy and desperate need to lash out at something you personally are
>> > wholly incapable of EVER coming close to producing. Oh snap, there I
>> > go beatin up long side yer fat ugly head with that 'ol bitch reality,
>> > ne?
>> >
>> > >> but your
>> > >> NONpinions aren't worth shit without some relevant argument behind
>> > >> them.
>> >
>> > >What? You mean, like, communicating with you and tell you *why* it
>> > >sucks? Why should I do that?
>> >
>> > Well, for starters NOT looking like a bumbling fuckin retard...then
>> > again maybe you're okay with that. *shrugs*
>>
>> That doesn't answer my question. Is there some reason why I should
>> motivate why my opinion is what it is?
>>
>> > >> And the bottom line is that you stupid, jealous fools HAVE NO
>> > >> arguments, all you have is whiney little bitch snits about how
>> > >> much you covet my work.
>> >
>> > >Huh? (Doesn't that word mean... ?)
>> > >
>> > >*looks up "covet"*
>> > >
>> > >No, I do not covet your work.
>> >
>> > So you just REALLY like that circa 1996 porn site look, huh?
>>
>> AFAIR, ca 1996 porn sites were very popular (though I don't see what
>> that has to do with your blog page).
>>
>> > >> The majority of you pathetic fools couldn't even
>> > >> DREAM of creating a site as advanced as some of the ones I've put
>> > >> together.
>> >
>> > >1. advanced != good
>> >
>> > You sounda like...cave man
>> >
>> > You...no lika teh...advancement
>> >
>> > *grunt* *grunt*
>> >
>> > Fire...pretty...but burn stupid caveman
>> >
>> > *grunt*
>> >
>> > Fire...no good
>>
>> The fact that your tool is newer does not automatically make the things
>> you build with it better.
>>
>> > >2. I have seen no evidence of your page being "advanced".
>> >
>> > Cupcake, you're so the fuck far outta yer league you wouldn't know
>> > advanced if it suddenly crawled the fuck up yer ass and EXPLODED.
>>
>> The page did not look one bit "advanced" to me.
>>
>> > >> Fact of the matter is...yer just a bunch of fuckin poser
>> > >> ass wannabes. So if you don't like my sites, if you wanna sit
>> > >> there dribbling in yer pullups and start whining about how much
>> > >> you think they "suck"...log the fuck off, Stupid, go somewhere
>> > >> else, cause I sure as FUCK didn't make ANY of sites for trainable
>> > >> muppet fuck tweenage Ritalin addicts like you stupid kids.
>> >
>> > >You posted the link in a newsgroup. You got comments. Live with it!
>> >
>> > You got your comments ripped apart and then got all smacked up like a
>> > stupid bitch. Pull up yer wet lil Huggies, dry yer eyes and learn to
>> > fuckin deal already.
>>
>> Your page still sucks.
>>
>
> I see Mad Boy has not replied to this, but he has made plenty of other
> posts.
>
> Therefore:
>
> _
> /' `.
> / /
> _ /| _ /__ /
> | \ / | '.`-Z__ `/
> _ |_/ / \| |\ | "`-._`-._
> / _ | | | \| .::. `-._)
> \_/ \ | \ | / ::' a
> _/ |/\ :: >
> | \ :' _C
> _/ /_______,_
> ||||| .' \_____)_,L
> ||||.\ / _______)__)
> ||||| c /_ / --. / `-..'
> //|( ) )\__,__.----. /
> \\)____|`--'--.____.'{
> '( j | \ \ \
> | /\ | \ \ \
> VK (_| (_\ \_\__\__
> `-` `-` \_\____)
I like this.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I am not so sure what you heard is not what I meant.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|