|
|
Posted by Fred on 05/23/06 02:35
Thanks, David. Yes, XHTML is what I meant. I'll just stick to HTML then.
"David Segall" <david@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:s5nr625c797gl25l34bv4fupc46crmcr98@4ax.com...
> "Fred" <testing@testing1212mouse.com> wrote:
>
> >Just about the time I have started to feel comfortable programming in
HTML,
> >this XML comes along. Would some kind soul pls post the difference
between
> >the two and why one is better than the other.
> >
> >Thanks!
> I think you meant to ask for a comparison of HTML and XHTML. If so,
> the main difference now is that XHTML tags have been changed slightly
> so that they conform more closely to the format required for an XML
> based language.
>
> I chose to write my web site using XHTML because W3C told me it was
> the modern thing to do <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/>. Since then I have
> discovered that my decision was controversial
> <http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml>. I don't regret my decision but
> you can justify staying with HTML by using Ian Hickson's arguments.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|