Posted by Ed Mullen on 10/12/23 11:49

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Chrissy wrote:
>
>> I'v done ok on my first pure html foray (no css)
>
> For some value of "ok". Yep, you're writing 1997-style code. Why would
> you not want to use CSS?
>
>> their code is:
>
> ..invalid.
>
>> <!survey>
>
> <!survey> is neither a valid HTML element, nor a valid comment. Perhaps
> you meant: <!-- survey --> (and) <!-- loan -->
>
> Try fixing that and see what happens. Well, it probably won't help
> fixing those two errors; you still have 394 *other* errors to go.
>
>> I'v trippled checked my code
>
> Oh, hopefully not!
>
> <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sworde.com%2Findex_files%2FRealIndex.htm>
> "Failed validation, 396 errors" ... not quite a record, though.
>

And, additionally, the page does not display well in some browser window
size and font size combinations. It forces horizontal scrolling.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
http://mozilla.edmullen.net
http://abington.edmullen.net
Why is it that when you transport something by car, it is called a
shipment, but when you transport something by ship, it is called cargo?

[Back to original message]