Posted by Sally Thompson on 05/29/06 17:47

On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:27:17 +0100, Jonathan N. Little wrote
(in article <e1fe3$447b04ca$40cba796$13853@NAXS.COM>):

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>
>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> I've read where the four worst HTML 'editors' are:
>>>>
>>>> 4. Microsoft FrontPage
>>>> 3. Microsoft Word
>>>> 2. Microsoft Excel
>>>> 1. Microsoft Publisher
>>>>
>>>> Let's give a rousing cheer for the team from Redmond!
>>>>
>>> #1 Publisher produces 'markup' (I will quote it because you have never
>>> seen such code)
>>
>>> http://www.redskyibizans.com/

<snip>

>>> I wrote her friend with some tactful
>>> suggestions, but must have still offended and never received a
>>> reply....
>>
>> I am tempted to email a somewhat less than tactful critique...
>>
>
> Well, I tried to explain Publisher is for office flowcharts and not for
> web publishing and offered links to NVu and IrfanViewer with my standard
> tutorial on resolution and web graphics...but...
>
> Maybe if the web 'designer' received enough 'critiques', she might be
> more receptive to me advice.


Since _none_ of the links on that page work for me (Firefox on an iMac), the
designer is probably safe!




--
Sally in Shropshire, UK
bed and breakfast near Ludlow: http://www.stonybrook-ludlow.co.uk
Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church:
http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk

[Back to original message]