Posted by Chris Tomlinson on 05/30/06 22:48

"Neredbojias" <http://www.neredbojias.com/fliam.php?cat=alt.html> wrote in
message news:Xns97D389C162ADhttpwwwneredbojiasco@208.49.80.251...
> To further the education of mankind, "Chris Tomlinson" <anon@anon.com>
> vouchsafed:
>
>>> It was superhighstreet. That didn't look bad at all with relative
>>> fonts and still doesn't look bad in Firefox. I suspect your
>>> insistence on changing it relates to a somewhat primitive notion of
>>> what does and does not look good in a web page. The best pages I've
>>> seen readjust the placement of their content with elegant facility.
>>> superhighstreet almost fits/did fit in that category now/then, and
>>> with just a little more effort on your part, would. Of course not
>>> everyone seeks perfection in the perfect way.
>>
>> Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. I tweaked the shadows so they
>> don't break when the tables are enlarged, and I can live with the
>> bullet point lines wrapping over to 2 lines if someone wants large
>> fonts in Firefox (a rare combination I think).
>
> Best of luck. Your site _is_ pretty attractive overall.

Cheers :D

--
Thanks,
Me

I recommend www.Superhighstreet.com/home Finds anything or they pay for it!
> --
> Neredbojias
> Infinity has its limits.

[Back to original message]