Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 06/01/06 04:43

dorayme wrote:
> In article <35ec8$447e5cfd$40cba79c$7639@NAXS.COM>,
> "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
>
>> dorayme wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Jonathan, it depends what is meant by relationship and data. Data
>>> in a 2 col table with only one row, used for layout, would
>>> satisfy this unless the definition was longer and more complex.
>>>
>> |Widget | Doohickeys |
>> ---+-------+------------+
>> Qty| 4 | 3 |
>>
>> Only one row, but rank and file relationship conveys some information
>> based on the intersection tells me it's a table...
>>
>>
>> Logo | Apple Pie |
>> -----+-----------+
>> Links| Toads |
>>
>> Table where arragement has no meaning* other than placement is not a table.
>>
>> *(unless your smoking something very strong whereby world events can be
>> predicted in the various shapes of discovered belly-button lint)
>
> Your post with the diags and explanations do not meet the idea of
> a strict general definition. I suspect there is just a whole
> collection of posts like yours with little diags and sentences
> and they all add up to the general idea.
>

Didn't know the idea was to create a strict definition but communicate a
concept. Anyway I'm an artist, what you you expect!

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

[Back to original message]