Posted by dorayme on 06/03/06 10:13

In article
<1149324082.867217.101990@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"verity" <verity.gray@mac.com> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
> > In article
> > <1149156979.330748.178460@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Travis Newbury" <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Second, HTML/CSS is child's play in comparison to web design.
> >
> > Oh yeah!
> >
> > --
> > dorayme
>
> Sorry, I think I might have misunderstood you, were you disagreeing or
> agreeing with HTML/CSS being child's play cf. web design ?
>
> Not very good at communicating, especially in this format. V

I think I was being flippant, concentrating on the html/css bit
of Travis's equation and thinking it is not exactly child's play
getting things to render in IE...

He may have a point though, but he is not a man of many words
(George Bush supporter you see...). Just thinking what you want
to do re the logic of a website is considerable work, sorting the
plain text content is a lot of work before the markup even
begins. Then there is the aethetics, the general colour schemes
and it goes on and on... but old Travis I think likes a bit of
flash and bang and that sort of thing and he might be meaning
other things.

[Hi Travis! :) ... where the hell are you these days?]

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]