Posted by PeterMcC on 06/03/06 19:07

johnfowles wrote in
<1149360392.012145.276710@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>

<snip>

> P.S. I failed to understand St. Peter's reference above to
> "perfection" Oh well you cannot win 'em all!!

On the off-chance that the above "Street Peter" refers to my post:
"perfection" is a reference to an earlier post in this thread in which
dorayme and I had a little light-hearted exchange about the difficulties,
within the western philosophical tradition, of defining perfection.

I suspect that you may be getting the wrong ends of various sticks and
taking offence where none was intended and possibly, probably inadventently,
risking giving offence where none is deserved; however, if I have caused you
any annoyance, please accept my apologies. The sig is genuinely meant.

Here's wishing you the good fortune that, in future, you can win 'em all.

--
PeterMcC
If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
inappropriate or offensive in any way,
please ignore it and accept my apologies.

[Back to original message]