Posted by sorry.no.email on 06/18/06 08:55

On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:48:55 +1000, dorayme
<doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>In article <QNOdnZ4diY55ywnZnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPAMGN@sohnen-moe.com> wrote:
>
>> > http://people.aapt.net.au/~adjlstrong/
>> >
>> > It is a somewhat self-indulgent project and I am not too sure of the
>> > ethics of borrowing so heavily (even if acknowledged) from the 2 sites
>> > credited at the top of the page?
>> >
>> The middle section which describe what's available, makes what's
>> available more difficult to understand than it should be. A list would be
>> more appropriate than a paragraph.
>
>I disagree. It is fine as it is in this respect: there is very
>little info to absorb, list would just take up more vertical
>space.
>
>Keep up simple as much as possible. You might max-width this
>particular content so it is easier to read, at least on modern
>browsers on big screens.

Hi Dorayme,

Thanks for these comments. I will add max-width, I assume you mean to
the paragraph text? I am not prepared to add the hacks to get this to
work in IE6 which I understand ignores max-width:

http://www.svendtofte.com/code/max_width_in_ie/

Definitely the plan is to keep simple, I would prefer to do simple
well rather than complex badly :-)

Thanks again for your assistance,

Andrew.
--

Andrew Strong
w(s pa/nt' a)/gan ai)nikta\ ka)safh= le/geis.

[Back to original message]