|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 06/25/06 18:16
Tony Marston wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:cY6dnZggTfrJJgPZnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>>Tony Marston wrote:
>>
>>>"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>
>
> <snip>
>
>>>Just because my understanding and implementation of OOP is different from
>>>yours does not make you right and me wrong.
>>>
>>
>>Other than the fact your understanding and implementation is different
>>from every expert in the field.
>
>
> What you mean is that people who think like you are the so-called *experts*
> while those who choose to think differently are *idiots*. What an arrogant
> pratt you are to think that YOUR brand of OO is the only true brand.
>
My understanding comes from people like Grady Booch, James Rumbaugh and Ivar
Jacobson - and is in complete agreement with these people. But of course, they
disagree with you, so you'll call them idiots, also.
>
>>You *think* you understand OO. But you have no idea what *real* OO is
>>about. Otherwise you wouldn't be making some of your comments.
>
>
> OO is about encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance. Nothing more,
> nothing less. What you choose to call *real* OO I call *bastardised* OO
> because some people of low intelligence are trying to make it more difficult
> than it really is.
>
Also message passing - which you seem to conveniently forget. And YOU are the
one "bastardizing" OO. Your sloppy approach to programming is just what *real*
OO is designed to eliminate. And it makes the coding much more maintainable,
expandable and modifiable.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
[Back to original message]
|