|
|
Posted by Lucky on 06/26/06 12:04
i didn't get you. what do you mean by make myself clear? didn't i gave
you the example? check my post before. and i clearly said what i wanted
to know. in the same post. but instead of targeting the problem you
said there is a syntaxt mistake in the code.
The problem is quite simple to understand. and tha is HOW TO USE OUTPUT
OF THE PROCEDURE TO CREATE CURSOR.
is it very hard to understand? i didnt know the syntaxt and all i
wanted to know was the syntaxt.
but instead telling me that, you asked me what kind of business logic i
want to use. do it really matter to know how the cursor can be created
from the output of the procedure?
and if you are member of the group for years than you should at least
be experienced by now to understand what one is asking.
as far as i know. the example i've posted was of MS SQL SERVER wasn't
from Oracle. but you cared to know wether i want to use PL/SQL or
T-SQL? i didn't asked to optimize some code.
ALL I ASKED IS JUST ONE DEFINATION OF CREATING CURSOR.
Erland Sommarskog wrote:
> Lucky (tushar.n.patel@gmail.com) writes:
> > I'm quite dissappointed with your Questions. what i wanted to do so far
> > is to use output of the stored procedure in the select statement of the
> > Declaring CURSOR. but you have diverted the conversation on the
> > different track.
>
> Yes, I want to help you to solve the real problem.
>
> I've been following technical newsgroups on Usenet for many years, and I
> early made the observation that when people asked "funny questions" was
> that they were trying to get from A to B, but instead they were asking
> of how to get from C ro D, because they the way from A to C and from
> D to B and now they were standing at deep ravine and not being able to
> cross. While there in fact there was a straight motorway from A to B,
> which was easy to point to, once the real problem had been uncovered.
>
> > -- for your convinience i gave you expamle of declaring cursor that i
> > had copied form the ms sql help but instead of understanding the
> > problem you complained about the syntaxt though that example was for to
> > understand the problem but you missed the target.
>
> I'm afraid that those are the rules. If you cannot make yourself clear
> what you are asking for, then you will not get very good answers. I'm
> sorry, but while I'm good at SQL, I am not good reading other people's
> thoughts.
>
> > -- PL SQL is of course in Oracle to write some custom business logic.
> > the same way you can do in SQL Server the name used in here is T-SQL.
> > it shouldn't be hard for you to understand.
>
> It happens frequently enough that people who use Oracle, MySQL or some
> other engine post to this newsgroup, that I felt obliged to rule out this
> possibility.
>
>
>
> --
> Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se
>
> Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
> Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx
[Back to original message]
|