Posted by Tony Marston on 06/26/06 08:09

"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:GcmdnahZBuoluALZnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@comcast.com...
> Tony Marston wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:ceOdneMn6a1vTwPZnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
<snip>
>>
>>>>OO is about encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance. Nothing more,
>>>>nothing less. What you choose to call *real* OO I call *bastardised* OO
>>>>because some people of low intelligence are trying to make it more
>>>>difficult than it really is.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Also message passing - which you seem to conveniently forget.
>>
>>
>> OO is about encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance. Message passing
>> is incidental.
>>
>>
>>> And YOU are the one "bastardizing" OO. Your sloppy approach to
>>> programming is just what *real* OO is designed to eliminate. And it
>>> makes the coding much more maintainable, expandable and modifiable.
>>
>>
>> Not the way some people use OO. They deliberately make it more
>> complicated than it need be, while I keep it as simple as possible.
>>
>
> And the way you use OO is a bastardization of OO techniques.

That's just your opinion. Just because my implementation of OO is different
from yours does not make it wrong, merely different. If you believe that
YOUR way is the ONLY way then you are just being arrogant.

--
Tony Marston

http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org

[Back to original message]