Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 06/26/06 10:37

Tony Marston wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:tMydnfBVrd_suQLZnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>>Tony Marston wrote:
>>
>>>"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>news:ceOdneMn6a1vTwPZnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>>OO is about encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance. Message passing
>>>is incidental.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>And YOU are the one "bastardizing" OO. Your sloppy approach to
>>>>programming is just what *real* OO is designed to eliminate. And it
>>>>makes the coding much more maintainable, expandable and modifiable.
>>>
>>>
>>>Not the way some people use OO. They deliberately make it more
>>>complicated than it need be, while I keep it as simple as possible.
>>>
>>
>>And that is where you are 100% wrong. Message passing is an integral part
>>of both object-based and object-oriented languages.
>>
>>One bit of wisdom, Tony. Tis better to remain silent and have everyone
>>thing you might be a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
>>
>>In the OO world you have removed all doubt.
>
>
> The three principles of OO are encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance.
> Message passing does not appear in that list, so it is a minor detail.
>

And that's where you are totally wrong.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]