Reply to Re: Better understanding of PRIMARY, UNIQUE, INDEX...
Posted by -Lost on 07/05/06 11:33
"Rik" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5cec3$44ab97d5$8259c69c$27716@news1.tudelft.nl...
>> should be set to
>> unique, to index AND unique.
> euhm 'should be st to unique, NOT to index AND unique'..
Heh. I wondered about that. Thanks for clearing the confusion.
Also, thanks for that informative review. I grasp the idea much clearer now.