|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 06/07/05 04:32
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:9J6pe.26694$d5.177730@newsb.telia.net...
>
> "Wrm" <nomailstodragon@north.invalid> skrev i meddelandet
> news:d82stu$s3r$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
> >
> > "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote in message
> > news:sY5pe.139693$dP1.490560@newsc.telia.net...
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > If it does not really have any disadvantage I have nothing against to
> use
> > > it.
> > > But may-be it is better to wait for other opinions.
> > > May-be there are other people in this NG who know of possible
> > disadvantages.
> >
> > I'd be VERY surprised if there are any disadvantages from using
include().
> >
> > <snip>
> > > 1) I still want to have both the html and the php version.
> >
> > There is no point having both.
> There is and
as I previously wrote
in order to legitimately protect the interests of my one-man business I
cannot always say what I am planning to do
>
> Besides, have you considered that you might
> > trigger Google (or other searchengines) duplicate filters and get
> penalties
> > for your page SERPs with same contents on .php and .html ?
It could happen but in this case I have other priorities-
Google has not shown to appreciate content anyway.
And, by the way, it does not show my pages with subsubdirectories.
> > <snip>
> >
> > > What about the site map?
> > > I want to build one. It can help both users and robots.
> > > Would you rather build one as an image, as a html document or a php
> > > document?
> >
> > I'd have site driven from database and php automatically building
sitemap
> > from data.
How do you do that?
--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/italien-valle-daosta/boende-i-valle-daosta.html
[Back to original message]
|