|
Posted by Wrm on 06/07/05 04:21
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote in message
news:sY5pe.139693$dP1.490560@newsc.telia.net...
<snip>
> If it does not really have any disadvantage I have nothing against to use
> it.
> But may-be it is better to wait for other opinions.
> May-be there are other people in this NG who know of possible
disadvantages.
I'd be VERY surprised if there are any disadvantages from using include().
<snip>
> 1) I still want to have both the html and the php version.
There is no point having both. Besides, have you considered that you might
trigger Google (or other searchengines) duplicate filters and get penalties
for your page SERPs with same contents on .php and .html ?
<snip>
> What about the site map?
> I want to build one. It can help both users and robots.
> Would you rather build one as an image, as a html document or a php
> document?
I'd have site driven from database and php automatically building sitemap
from data.
> Would you use CSS for the layout?
Yes.
[Back to original message]
|