Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 08/26/06 22:46

"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
news:doraymeRidThis-9D504E.08302927082006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <cL3Ig.14430$E02.5484@newsb.telia.net>,
> "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:
>
> > "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
> > news:doraymeRidThis-0ABC99.08113527082006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> > >
> > > > > Nf V fnvq orsber, Yhvtv, lbh ner ab fpvragvfg. Vs O znantrq gb
> > > > > svaq ng enaqbz va sebag bs gur Ingvpna 100 Vgnyvnaf gung unq
> > > > > ivfvgrq lbhe cntr, gur fgngf ur dhbgrf jbhyq or dhvgr fvtavsvpnag
> > > > > vaqrrq.
> >
> > Please, check up your use of subjunctive.
> > What he said was irrelevant.
> > He was only talking about a little part of Rome.
> > Furthermore I trust logins...
>
> I checked, what is wrong?
>
> If he had set up in front of the Vatican where folk from all over
> Italy and the world visit, this would not make it an unreliable
> spot to be conducting such a survey.
>
> --
> dorayme


1) You had written
"As I said before, Luigi, you are no scientist. If B managed to
find at random in front of the Vatican 100 Italians that had
visited your page, the stats he quotes would be quite significant
indeed."

and not what you had stated above.

2) I would have written:
"if B had managed to find at random in front of the Vatican 100 Italians who
had visited your page, the stats he had quoted would have been quite
significant indeed"

--
Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/
我照想了

[Back to original message]