|
Posted by Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\) on 10/01/91 11:18
Hi
First take the system architect out of the building and have him shot.
Then take the IT Manager outside and have her shot for hiring such an
architect.
Then take each developer out and have them shot for not knowing better.
Add indexes. They are one of the basic design fundamentals required with any
database.
Regards
--------------------------------
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Stu" <stuart.ainsworth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118415503.154653.85890@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I can think of no good reason to NOT use indexes; that should be a
> basic ingedient to any performance improvement attempt. It should also
> be transparent to any development staff they have (in other words,
> programmers should suggest what indexes they think would be
> appropriate, but in most cases they shouldn't worry about developing
> them on an as-needed basis).
>
> If you are going to add indexes, you may also want to place your
> clustered indexes on your data drive, and your other indexes on the log
> drive; this may help improve speed as well. I typically try to have a
> third drive available for indexes, but sometimes that's not an option.
>
> Just my .02.
>
> Stu
>
[Back to original message]
|