Posted by WookieTim on 09/02/06 14:32

> Actually *who* are your responding to? It was 'numberwhun' who suggested
> that another group would be better suited for your question, not Jukka
> of which you directly replied to in the thread. But of course since you
> *top posted* this is unclear. This is not Google Groups, it is usenet.
>

Let's see... Jukka proceeded to say that there were no stupid questions
just stupid people, then proceeded to tell me to look less "Stupid".
Yeah - that's really a great direct response to my question.

> Fine, however how do you expect anyone to reasonably diagnose your
> problem with what you offered for evidenced? Certainly not a URL or code
> to so we can actually see what you are doing! It is like calling a
> doctor over the phone and saying, "Doctor it hurts when I do this".
>
> Just saying I have a Java applet and some JavaScript and a webpage and
> this happens, be real!
>

The question was asked in regard to whether Java Applets completely
reload when the style property of the <Div> element they are on has
it's "Display" property changed. This is a rather simple question and
should not need a whole lot of code - it was being asked whether anyone
had seen this problem before. It turns out that it is not specific to
my code but general accross all Javascript/HTML code.


> With respect to what markup? So I assume that your JavaScript (that you
> did not show) on a page (that you did not reference) is changing the CSS
> of some elements (that we cannot see) on this page (we also cannot see)
> is used to create a 'tabbed' interface?
>

After the reception I recieved to my original post, why should I share
code with you? If someone had ASKED, perhaps. However, I was
immediately called stupid by multiple people. Perhaps next time, rather
than say "You are stupid you should show us code" people in this group
could say "Could you please share a representative bit of code so we
can diagnose the problem?"

[Back to original message]