Posted by dorayme on 09/10/06 05:13

In article <dcMMg.15992$E02.6185@newsb.telia.net>,
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:

> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> skrev i meddelandet
> news:C6MMg.93818$5i3.39148@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
> >
> > > How does the style-sheet look now?
> > > I get a parse error.
> >
> > Doesn't surprise me ...
> >
> > At least the lines aren't so long. However, it is still a convoluted
> > mess.
>
> It did not play any role whether the lines were long or short...

All this about formatting has to do with it being easy to read.
Nothing about validation. In science there is a relationship
between the simplicity of a theory and its truth only because
humans will likely make a complete hash of testing and assembling
a truly complicated theory. But there is no obvious reason, there
may be a reason but not an obvious one, why reality is
essentially simple. There is a reason why human theories need to
be. It has to do with the limitations of the human mind. Help
humans along Luigi and cast out the CSS and HTML and make
everything simpler. Be as a child and charm and disarm your
customers. Soothe us. Humour us. We are your friends. Have a
website just that you let us see. Let the non-friends have the
difficult one if a difficult one need be.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]