Posted by dorayme on 01/23/44 11:58

In article <EGmPg.16966$E02.6608@newsb.telia.net>,
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:

> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
> news:doraymeRidThis-4C4639.10334018092006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> > In article <UplPg.16964$E02.6685@newsb.telia.net>,
> > "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/bilder/giocatrice/giocatrice-pallamano-640X480.jpg
> > > > > and
> > > > >
> > >
> https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/bilder/giocatrice/giocatrice-pallamano.jpg
> > > > > It was possible when I used another computer but I am having
> sometimes
> > > > > problems using this...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The problem with these pics is that the poor girl does not have a
> > > > skin disease but that the photos have been badly prepared.
> > > > Probably over compressed.
> > >
> > > Over compressed?
> > > Both the larger and the smaller?
> >
> > What if it was the larger only? What will you do about it? Lets
> > do one thing at a time.
>
>
> I think that you were right!
> Have a look at the page now!
>

Yes, the pic is much better now. But the page is worse in another
way because you have bought this improvement at the cost of a
massive file size for the jpg. You have gone from 20K to 236K.
You don't have to have that file size to get an acceptable
quality. IT can be made to under 50K and be still very good
compared with the original 20K one.

If you can't do this with your software, I am happy on this
occasion to do it for you.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]