Posted by dorayme on 09/20/06 22:12

In article
<1158746393.556626.94400@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
"Travis Newbury" <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
> > > I am sure we have discussed this to no end a billion times. You will
> > > not change my mind, not am I likely to change yours.
> > Slight misunderstanding old boy, there is a (silly question) on
> > how all websites should be in respect to fixed size, there are
> > questions (sensible) on how most of them should be prima facie
> > and there is the question of how boring and meaningless all this
> > talk is. I was addressing the very latter. And you, secretly, do
> > not find it boring at all. I know Travis. You are as keen as
> > mustard on the question.
>
> There is nothing new in the arguments. If someone could come up with a
> new reason either for or against fixed width then maybe some excitement
> would enter into the picture. but until then, I really do think it is
> boring...

You have to be careful how you count arguments. Old arguments can
be revived with effect and you might miss them because they "look
the same".

I trust you find this remark helpful?

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]