Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 09/24/06 16:17

Sally Thompson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:37:15 +0100, Jonathan N. Little wrote
> (in article <61c2e$45168a31$40cba7b0$26074@NAXS.COM>):
>
>> Hywel Jenkins wrote:
>>> In article <6ff0b$4513efa3$40cba77e$19458@NAXS.COM>,
>>> lws4art@centralva.net says...
>>>> richard wrote:
>>>>> http://www.lovepixel.idv.tw/
>>>>>
>>>>> Give it some time to load. The results will shock you.
>>>>> I won't give away what to expect.
>>>>>
>>>> Crap, so your point is?
>>> I see RtS is back. Save yourself.
>>>
>>
>> I must be still bleary-eyed this morning. What or who is RtS?
>>
>>
>
> Google for Richard Bullis :-)
> Warning, some of it is Not Nice Reading (TM).
>
>

Thanks Sally, our dear "richard" here seems to have a similar inane
quality to his posts, but I have noticed over the years several
"Richards" that fit this generalizations. But can one be sure he is
*the* BtS? Being "clueless" is not a rare affliction in Usenet.
--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

[Back to original message]