|
|
Posted by Chris F.A. Johnson on 10/11/06 23:13
On 2006-10-11, Paul Watt wrote:
> "Peter" <peter@enjoyyourworld.removetheobvious.com> wrote in message
> news:egjmjt$ndq$4@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have recently published our travelsite consisting of photo's,
>> destination information and travel logs. I was wondering if you could take
>> a look to see what you think of it. Are there things unclear or would you
>> do different? I'd really like to hear!
>>
>> http://www.enjoyyourworld.com
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Peter
> On the whole I liked it, I like the colour scheme in particular.
> Things I didn't like:
>
> 1) fixed width at 1024X768. If you're going to do a fixed width, it should
> be for 800 x 600.
That's no better, and it's worse for someone with a 1200+px
window. With 4 coluns to the page, it would be pretty much
unreadable at 800px.
A fixed-width page works well *only*at*that*one*width*; don't do
it.
> 2) The animated map thing in the header gets annoying.
It doesn't annoy me, because flash doesn't play unless I click on
it. If there's anything important in it, there's a good chance I
won't see it.
> 3) You're using javascript for your drop down menu. Personally I dont rely
> on anything that can be turned of for something as vital as
> navigation.
Not only that, but part of the menu is inaccessible, because it is
obscured by other elements on the page.
> 4) Fails validation
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.enjoyyourworld.com%2F&ss=1&outline=1
> and last but not least its the "grafton centre" not "gafton centre :D
--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
[Back to original message]
|