Reply to Re: email address obfuscation

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by John Dunlop on 10/14/06 08:05

dorayme:

> What mangling are you talking about?

Mangling URLs by percent-encoding octets that could have remained as
raw data.

| For consistency, percent-encoded octets in the ranges
| of ALPHA (%41-%5A and %61-%7A), DIGIT (%30-%39),
| hyphen (%2D), period (%2E), underscore (%5F), or tilde
| (%7E) should not be created by URI producers and, when
| found in a URI, should be decoded to their corresponding
| unreserved characters by URI normalizers.

(RFC3986 : 2.3)

Two conditions:

1. Unreserved characters should not be percent-encoded.
2. If found, they should be decoded.

E-mail address obfuscation that percent-encodes the octets of
unreserved characters runs afoul of (1). And if 'global transcription'
is a consideration, anyone who obfuscates their address in this way
relies on (2).

> If so, who besides alt.html types will it seem so unprofessional to?

Anyone, I'd imagine, faced with a URL chock full of %xx. If it hasn't
yet been decoded.

--
Jock

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация