Posted by Andy Dingley on 10/26/06 16:07

Harlan Messinger wrote:

> 2. By its own terms, "This appendix is informative". It isn't normative;
> it doesn't grant or deny permission for anything. It declares no musts
> nor shoulds nor mays nor may nots nor must nots.

Then if you impose that strict an interpretation, even 1.0 Appendix C
is invalid (as far as "invalid" matters).

My point is that whatever (or how little) leeway is available for 1.0
under Appendix C, this isn't available for 1.1 I don't think we're
disagreeing on that much.

[Back to original message]