Reply to Re: What Next?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Sanders Kaufman on 11/16/06 23:57

Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Gregor)
>
>> Anyway, all the talk about XHTML is wasted as far as my personal issues,
>> although people obviously want to discuss it for their interest. I have
>> started coding my pages in XHTML 1.1 and it really presents no major
>> challenge.
>
> Because you're sending it as text/html, which is _not_ recommended.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary

There's no reason to think it's being sent as
text/html. As the link you posted points out -
there's actually 3 others that work perfectly well.

But even if it is being sent as text/html, what's
the problem? HTML text travels just as well as XML
text.

In the HTML4 spec, it says that you shouldn't use
tables as page layout tools - but who pays attention
to that?! Getting too bogged down in the W3C spec
is a great way to hobble yourself.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация