|
|
Posted by K A Nuttall on 11/17/06 08:09
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Here's a thread from 2004, discussing this same subject once
> again.
> <http://groups.google.com/group/macromedia.dreamweaver/browse_frm/t
> hread/3ab1dd1b8a3e05b2/1fe477e46feec3b3?tvc=1&q=alt.html+why+not+us
> e+font+size+keywords#1fe477e46feec3b3>
Oh god, I need to lie down. Unfortunately, that thread is a bit like
this one: full of conflicting opinions, thinly veiled insults,
dogmatism, and very little hard fact - and eleven pages of it, in
Google Groups.
I've adopted this 100% idea, for a test period. Some sources say to use
it on <html>, some say <body>, and nowhere can I find an in-depth
analysis of its effects on different browsers, compared to the use of
size names, other than using it to counteract the effects of the IE em
bug. I'll have to find time to experiment with this.
--
K A Nuttall
www.yammer.co.uk
Re-type the e-mail address how it sounds, remove .invalid
[Back to original message]
|