Posted by Vic Spainhower on 12/17/06 03:30

Andy,

You've been a great help and I mean that sincerely!I added the "real name"
and switched back to aggressive and they now flow through. Seems like a
minor problem (to me anyways) that it would consider it spam. However, I do
have 1 email which is the lost password email which is still getting
rejected. I directed one of these emails back to you and was hoping you
would see what SpamAssassin says about it.

Thanks,

Vic


"Andy Hassall" <andy@andyh.co.uk> wrote in message
news:eis8o298uq2ajgdjr80900sk9ae8bjs373@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:10:30 -0800, "Vic Spainhower" <vic@showsec.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I took you up on your offer and directed an email from the system to
>>andy@andyh.co.uk so we can see what SpamAssassin says about it.
>
> Here's what it says:
>
> Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
> 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
> [score: 0.4999]
>
> I've got it set to be fairly fussy; a 1.0 score is low, and even that
> would be
> easily fixed by modifying your From header to include a name, like:
>
> From: "Show My Horse Support" <support@showmyhorse.com>
>
> ... which would drop it right back down to zero at least on my system.
>
> --
> Andy Hassall :: andy@andyh.co.uk :: http://www.andyh.co.uk
> http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space :: disk and FTP usage analysis tool

[Back to original message]