Posted by Andy Dingley on 12/19/06 12:48

Jim S wrote:

> Are you saying that each page should have its own /images folder rather than
> having all the images (photos in my case) in one folder?

First of all, each page can't have its own "/images" directory. If it
begins with "/", it's root-relative (as Jukka correctly points out) and
there's only going to be one of them.

Nor ought it to have a "images" sub-directory, Not because it's wrong,
but because it's pointless. Keep your per-page images close to the
pages that use them, it's just easier to organise like that. "images"
sub-directories are one more level of hassle and they add nothing.

[Back to original message]