Posted by Ivan Marsh on 12/19/06 16:44

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:38:10 +0100, Michael Fesser wrote:

> .oO(Ivan Marsh)
>
>>The only thing to tell them is that processing .htm files as anything
>>other than HTML files is simply not right.
>
> Having .htm(l), .php and maybe even more extensions in the URLs on the
> same site is not right either.

What other purpose do file extensions serve other than to identify the
content of the file and how it should be processed?

[Back to original message]